Translation of "Cours de règlement journalier " (French → English) :

(j) prescribing requirements in respect of the books, records and other documents required by subsection 29(1) to be kept by market participants, including the form in which and the period for which the books, records and other documents are to be kept; (k) regulating the listing or trading of publicly traded securities including requiring reporting of trades and quotations; (l) regulating recognized stock exchanges, recognized self-regulatory organizations, recognized quotation and trade reporting systems and recognized clearing agencies, including prescribing requirements in respect of the review or approval by the Commission of any ...[+++]bylaw, rule, regulation, policy, procedure, interpretation or practice; (m) regulating trading or advising in securities to prevent trading or advising that is fraudulent, manipulative, deceptive or unfairly detrimental to investors; (n) regulating trading or advising in penny stocks, including prescribing requirements in respect of additional disclosure and suitability for investment; (o) prescribing categories or subcategories of issuers for purposes of the prospectus requirements under this Act, the regulations and the rules and classifying issuers into categories or subcategories; (p) regulating in respect of, or varying this Act to facilitate, expedite or regulate in respect of, the distribution of securities, or the issuing of receipts, including by establishing

Therefore, and as confirmed by the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, regulated prices may be adopted only when they serve the general economic interest and are proportionate, clearly defined, transparent, non-discriminatory and verifiable.

These are largely claim settlements that haven't closed, so the money is not required in this fiscal accounting period.

19. In accordance to its commitments, and along the lines presented above, the Commission has introduced new provisions in favour of further untying in its proposals for the current renewal of the ALA regulation and the Regulation on Communicable Diseases and Reproductive Health [14].

The Directive also includes rules for payment systems which are not based on netting but on gross settlement systems (where each payment order is settled individually on a real time basis as it arises during the day): The proposed Directive would also exempt payment systems from national rules giving retroactive effect to the insolvency of a participant in a payment system, such as the zero-hour rule. Such retroactive effect allows the liquidator of an insolvent institution to challenge payment orders which have already been introduced into the payment system, thus leading to the unwinding of the settlement operation. This unwinding is h ...[+++]ighly disruptive and can lead to systemic risk. The same is true for revocation of payment orders. Revocation of a large payment order in a payment system during the settlement process, could lead to systemic risk. The Directive would therefore bar revocation of payment orders after the moment contractually fixed by the payment system participants. The insolvency of a participant in a payment system, insofar as it concerned its dealings with the payment system, would be governed by the insolvency law of the country where the payment system was located, according to the proposed Directive. This would avoid conflicts of law and the ensuing legal uncertainty and thus facilitate cross-border participation in payment systems. Collateral security is pledged by the participants in a payment system in order to secure its exposures against the other participants. When collateral security is provided in a cross-border arrangement, its realisation in case of default of the pledging participant can be hindered by conflicts of law which may either weaken the collateral security or even render it unenforceable. In order to ensure collateral security can be realised immediately and in priority over all other creditors (so as not to jeopardise the liquidity of the other participants in the system, i.e. to avoid systemic risk) in the case of a defaul ...

The Court finds that legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings constitutes, as in Romano, a provision for reduction of benefit within the meaning of Regulation No 1408/71 as amended.