Traduction de «Sur la base des réclamations » (Français → Anglais) :

As regards the fourth head of claim, seeking annulment of the decision rejecting the complaint, it should be recalled that an action formally directed against the decision rejecting the complaint has the effect of bringing before the Tribunal the measure against which the complaint was filed, when rejection of the complaint, as such, lacks any independent content (judgment of 15 September 2011, Case F‑6/10 Munch v OHIM, paragraph 24 and the case-law cited).

The promise of Iran is that there is now a grassroots social movement calling for democracy.

They may be challenged, in the particular context of a given complaints procedure, only by having regard to all the circumstances of the individual case, in particular those relating to the complainant himself, the purpose of his complaint and any relationship which he and, where appropriate, the person(s) implicated in the complaint have with the members of the appeals committee.

In addition to this impact, the proposed amendments to the BIA and CCAA could have the following results: first, the amendments could elevate billions of dollars of potential pension claims ahead of lenders in the priority ladder; second, the amendments could cause credit markets to re-value assets available for security and deduct higher-priority claims, thus resulting in a significant reduction of available credit; and third, the amendments could result in immediate default situations based on covenants in existing trust indentures restricting the existence of claims that would have priority over the existing lender.

While I firmly disagreed with both their theology and politics, most of the leaders of the CCF also used their faith as a primary basis to call for political and social change.

€ 60.6 million charged to Spain for non-respect of payment deadlines in the nuts payment scheme; € 53.7 million charged to United Kingdom for non-respect of payment deadlines; € 48.5 million charged to Italy for non-respect of payment deadlines; € 35.8 million charged to Greece because the LPIS (Land parcel identification system) implemented to manage the direct payments schemes was found to be not fully operational to the standard required and on-the-spot checks were still carried out too late to be fully effective; € 26.7 million charged to the Netherlands because of the insufficient number of substitution controls in the export r ...[+++]efund scheme; € 17 million charged to Spain for non-respect of payment deadlines; € 8.7 million charged to France concerning the over thirty months slaughter scheme – technical and accounting controls were found to be deficient; € 7.5 million charged to France for weaknesses in the control system for subsidised-interest-loans and in secondary controls concerning Rural Development Programmes expenditure;