Traduction de «Traduction simultanée » (Français → Anglais) :

13. Agrees with the principle that verbatim reports of proceedings in plenary should be published as a multi-lingual document in which the statements of the speakers only appear in the original language, on the understanding that filmed versions of the debates, together with live interpretation into all the official languages, be made available free of charge to the general public on demand on an appropriate technical platform and that only the original text is authoritative, given that, legally, interpretation is not an oral translation; is of the opinion that Members must be entitled to have access to extracts of debates translated in ...[+++]to their language, with the possibility of downloading those extracts, and that without delay; is of the opinion also that provision must be made to keep a digital and searchable archive; requests the Secretary-General to draw up a formal proposal implementing that decision of principle, which would include anti-abuse clauses and identify, if indicated, potential changes to the Rules of Procedure (such as Rule 173) and to other internal rules which are necessary to put the proposed new approach into practice;

It is intolerable that there are no women present at any of the debates, conferences or meetings even on Iraq – just as they were absent from discussions on Afghanistan, Kosovo and East Timor – not even to serve coffee or interpret.

As Mr Brok clearly said this morning, as I understood through the interpreter, we are practically going to establish a genuine State.

[English] Mr. Jack Iyerak Anawak (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development): [Editor's Note: Member spoke in Inuktitut.] [English] The Deputy Speaker: I trust members of the Official Opposition will not expect a simultaneous translation of those comments.

Senator Rivard: Regardless of the level, whether at the Ontario Court or the Quebec Superior Court, do you think that simultaneous interpretation is a reasonable option or should there be bilingual judges who can understand and express themselves clearly without that service?

I would like to interrupt the proceedings at this point because we are not able to simultaneously translate it, and the committee has a policy to proceed with the simultaneous translation right away.