Traduction de «acheteur de temps » (Français → Anglais) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 206 Mr. Alex Atamanenko: With respect to Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program entitlement, the appeals process and exclusion from entitlement to other federal agricultural programs: (a) are appellants entitled to know what recommendations are made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained by the appellant; (b) are appellants entitled to know on what grounds the Intermediate Appeals Sub-Committee rejects recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained by the appellant; (c) has the CAIS administration ever issued rejection letters to an appellant ...[+++]before or after soliciting the involvement of an appeals committee and, if so, how is a copy of the motion or other directive permitting this obtained by the appellant; (d) who is responsible for forwarding recommendations made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (e) are there any legitimate grounds upon which the National CAIS Committee (NCC) administration is allowed to refuse an appellant the full extent of an appeal by neglecting to forward the recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (f) does the appeal process deal with appeals on a case by case basis or can the NCC administration short-circuit the appeals process based on a judgment that an appellant's complaint is just like the one that may have preceded it; (g) are there guidelines established that would give an appellant a reasonable expectation of the time it should take to address an appeal at all the various levels and, if so, what are the guidelines that govern a reasonable expectation; (h) is the appellant justified in expecting that the decisions made by appeals committees will be communicated to the appellant; (i) what are the circumstances under which it would be accepta ...

It receives numerous complaints and is informed of the difficulties experienced by timeshare purchasers from different sources, including the European Consumer Centres Network.

2. Notes in addition that many companies are taking advantage of concessions applying to trade with non-member countries to relocate their labour-intensive production wholly or in part to regions where conditions as regards health and safety, working time, pay, social security, and employee representation are far poorer than in the EU and that this fact is not made clear to buyers and consumers, especially where semi-finished goods are concerned;

The purpose of the Directive was to harmonise the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of the purchasers of the right to use a timeshare property (they do not actually acquire ownership of any kind or any future right over such ownership; hence under Spanish law there is a ban on the use of the term ‘multi-ownership’ or any other term which may suggest that a purchaser is acquiring the right of ownership).

the Directive does not cover purchasers' rights to use immovable property on a timeshare basis for less than 3 years, nor does it provide for purchasers who have signed a contract referring to a similar right, with a time span of less than one week;

The draft Directive specifies the minimum elements of the contract: - description of the immovable property, - precise nature of the timeshare right, - periods and dates of entitlement, - common facilities, - total cost for the purchaser, - amount of annual charges, etc. 2. In order to ensure that the purchaser has enough time to consider fully the implications of the transaction, the draft Directive stipulates that Member States must make provision for a cooling-off period of 14 days (for a purchase within the Member State) and 28 days (for a purchase in another Member State), within which the purchaser has the right to withdraw from th ...[+++]e contract.